NVIDIA A100 40GB vs 80GB

Both A100 models share the same Ampere architecture and third-generation Tensor Cores - so raw compute is identical. The real decision comes down to memory: how much your models and datasets need, and whether you're optimising for cost-efficiency or maximum performance. Here's how they stack up on mCloud.

 

Specifications

Where They Differ

The differences are concentrated in memory capacity, bandwidth, and power draw. Everything below the cards is identical on both models.

Best for cost-efficiency

NVIDIA A100

40GB HBM2

The price-to-performance choice for inference, fine-tuning, and MIG-partitioned multi-tenant workloads that fit comfortably in 40GB.

  • GPU memory40GB HBM2
  • Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s PCIe
  • Max TDP250W PCIe
  • MIG instancesUp to 7 @ 5GB
  • Lowest power drawYes most efficient per watt

Identical on both models

Same Ampere die, same third-generation Tensor Cores: peak compute does not change with memory capacity.

9.7 TFLOPS
FP64
19.5 TFLOPS
FP32 / FP64 Tensor Core
312 TFLOPS
TF32 Tensor Core*
624 TFLOPS
FP16 / BF16 Tensor Core*
1,248 TOPS
INT8 Tensor Core*
7
Max MIG instances
Ampere
GPU architecture
600 GB/s
NVLink bridge (2 GPUs)

Benefits

Two Models, Two Strengths

A100 40GB: the efficient workhorse

Maximise value per GPU

  • Lower cost of entry. The most affordable way onto the A100 platform when your workloads fit within 40GB of memory.
  • Lower power draw. A 250W PCIe TDP versus 300W on the 80GB means less energy per GPU, with better efficiency and density.
  • Ideal for inference & fine-tuning. Delivers up to 245× inference throughput over CPU-only servers on BERT-Large.
  • Multi-tenant ready. Partition into up to seven 5GB MIG instances to right-size acceleration across many users and jobs.
  • Best price-to-performance for development environments, batch inference, and models that don't need the extra headroom.

Performance · AI Training

Training the Largest Models

Training huge recommender models like DLRM is bound by how much fits in GPU memory. The 80GB's extra capacity allows larger batch sizes, delivering up to 3× the training throughput of the 40GB, and well beyond the previous-generation V100.

NVIDIA V100FP16, batch 32
 
0.7×
A100 40GBFP16, batch 32
 
A100 80GBFP16, batch 48
 

DLRM training on the HugeCTR framework, FP16, relative time per 1,000 iterations. NVIDIA A100 datasheet.

Performance · AI Inference

Inference Throughput over CPU

For high-throughput inference like BERT-Large, both A100 models leave CPU-only servers far behind, more than 240× the sequences per second. On this workload the two cards are effectively matched, so the 40GB delivers flagship inference without the memory premium.

CPU onlyDual Xeon Gold 6240, FP32
 
A100 40GBINT8 + sparsity
 
245×
A100 80GBINT8 + sparsity
 
249×

BERT-Large inference, sequences per second. CPU: dual Xeon Gold 6240, FP32, batch 128. A100 40GB and 80GB: batch 256, INT8 with sparsity. NVIDIA A100 datasheet.

Performance · Real-Time Inference

Where Memory Helps Inference

On latency-sensitive, single-stream inference such as RNN-T speech recognition, the 80GB's extra headroom pulls ahead, up to 1.25× the throughput of the 40GB on the same MIG slice.

A100 40GB1/7 MIG slice
 
A100 80GB1/7 MIG slice
 
1.25×

RNN-T single-stream inference, MLPerf 0.7, measured on one (1/7) MIG slice. TensorRT 7.2, LibriSpeech, FP16. NVIDIA A100 datasheet.

Performance · Data Analytics

Big Data Analytics at Scale

On a 10TB analytics benchmark spanning ETL, SQL, ML, and NLP, the 80GB completes the run in half the time of the 40GB, 2× faster, and up to 8× faster than the V100.

V100 32GBRAPIDS / Dask
 
A100 40GBRAPIDS / Dask / BlazingSQL
 
A100 80GBRAPIDS / Dask / BlazingSQL
 

GPU-BDB big-data analytics benchmark: 30 retail queries plus ETL, ML, and NLP on a 10TB dataset, relative time to solution. NVIDIA A100 datasheet.

Performance · HPC

High-Performance Computing

For memory-bound HPC like Quantum Espresso, the 80GB delivers up to 1.8× the performance of the 40GB at full FP64 precision. Across the top HPC applications, the A100 generation is around 11× faster than the 2016 P100.

A100 40GBQuantum Espresso, FP64
 
A100 80GBQuantum Espresso, FP64
 
1.8×

Quantum Espresso, CNT10POR8 dataset, FP64, relative time to solution. The 11× figure is the geometric-mean speedup over P100 across top HPC apps. NVIDIA A100 datasheet.

Not sure which A100 you need?

Configure either model with the pricing calculator, or talk to our Australian-based cloud specialists about matching the right GPU to your workload.

 

Sign up for the Micron21 Newsletter